Legal Opinion

Madden v. Madden

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 4, 2019No. A18-0505PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

And in paragraph 26b of the dissolution decree, the dissolution court found as follows:

[Judy] is capable of obtaining employment as an accounting clerk, billing clerk, customer service representative, and general office clerk, within a three month period to allow her time to learn the Microsoft Office Suite. She can earn $14.28 per hour, or $29,702 per year. [Judy] is a bright woman who is capable of acquiring fresh credentials in the accounting field designed to update and advance her skill level. With a two-year *694education commitment either at the baccalaureate or graduate level, she could…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Marriage of Erlandson v. ErlandsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Marriage of Nardini v. NardiniSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Marriage of Dobrin v. DobrinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. Lee v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  5. Marriage of Broms v. BromsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In the Marriage of: Sarah Nicole Smith v. Jonathan George SmithCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2026
  2. Peter K Butler v. Shari MooreCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API