Legal Opinion
Banowitz v. State Exchange Bank
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 18, 1985No. 84 C 2818PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ROVNER, District Judge.
Eight individual investors 1 (collectively “plaintiffs”) sued the State Exchange Bank (“Bank”) and certain officers, directors and owners 2 of both the Bank and the now bankrupt State Exchange Finance Company (“SEFCO”) (collectively “defendants”) in a six-count Amended Complaint alleging the following violations by defendants: (1) the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-68 (Count One); (2) Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“1934 Act”) § 10(b), 15 U.S.C. § 78j (“Section 10(b)”) and related SEC Rule…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Aaron v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Haroco, Inc. v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, Walter E. Heller International Corporation, & Ronald J. GrayheckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Beck v. Cantor, Fitzgerald & Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
- Reshal Associates, Inc. v. Long Grove Trading Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- Coronet Insurance v. SeyfarthDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
- Morgan v. Kobrin Securities, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
- PHARMERICA CHICAGO, INC. v. MeiselsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.