Legal Opinion

State v. Fitzgerald

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

The property condemned, and for the taking of which damages and compensation were awarded herein, consists of a three-sided parcel, one side of which is upon a slight curve, lying in the northwesterly corner of tract A in Coggan’s Second Addition to the city of La Grande. It was required for the right of way in connection with the construction of an under-grade crossing beneath the main line tracks of the Union Pacific Kailroad Company in La Grande.

Upon the parcel condemned and property immediately adjacent thereto there was a warehouse. Easterly therefrom and on the opposite side of a spur…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Utter v. . RichmondNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. St. Louis, Lawrence & Denver Railroad v. WilderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  3. Newsom v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. The Bank of Auburn v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  5. Bates v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re D'EllenaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
  2. LEATHERS ET UX. v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. State Highway Commission v. Carmel Estates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  4. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Superbilt Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Pacific General Contractors, Inc. v. Slate Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API