State v. Fitzgerald
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
The property condemned, and for the taking of which damages and compensation were awarded herein, consists of a three-sided parcel, one side of which is upon a slight curve, lying in the northwesterly corner of tract A in Coggan’s Second Addition to the city of La Grande. It was required for the right of way in connection with the construction of an under-grade crossing beneath the main line tracks of the Union Pacific Kailroad Company in La Grande.
Upon the parcel condemned and property immediately adjacent thereto there was a warehouse. Easterly therefrom and on the opposite side of a spur…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Utter v. . RichmondNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- St. Louis, Lawrence & Denver Railroad v. WilderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Newsom v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- The Bank of Auburn v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Bates v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re D'EllenaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
- LEATHERS ET UX. v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- State Highway Commission v. Carmel Estates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Superbilt Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Pacific General Contractors, Inc. v. Slate Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.