Legal Opinion

LEATHERS ET UX. v. Peterson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1952PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHay, J.

This is an action in forcible entry and detainer. The complaint is in the usual form, and complies with the provisions of § 8-314, OCLA, with the additional allegation that plaintiffs are the owners in fee simple of the property involved, which is described as lots 13 and 14, block 32, Flanagan Addition to North Bend, Coos County, Oregon. The defendant, by his answer, admitted that he is in possession of the property, but denied generally the remainder of the complaint. For an affirmative defense he alleged: That plaintiff, R. H. W. Leathers, made certain money advances to defendant and to a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Public Market Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Harmon v. Grants Pass Banking & Trust Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Caro v. WollenbergOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Stephens v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Bickel v. WessingerOregon Supreme Court · 1911

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Blue River Sawmills, Ltd. v. GatesOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Fry v. DH Overmyer Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. R.H.W. Leathers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  5. Rizo v. MacBethAlaska Supreme Court · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API