Legal Opinion
Greenspan v. Greenspan
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided February 7, 1941PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Stafford, A. M.
The complainant, Rose Greenspan, on or about March 2d, 1937, filed a bill for maintenance,wherein she charged that the defendant, Louis Greenspan, had obtained a decree of divorce against the complainant in the Republic of Mexico, State of Morelos, but that the same had been procured by-fraud, suppression of the truth, and false statements, and that the courts of Mexico at no time had jurisdiction over the subject-matter or jurisdiction over the complainant or defendant. As a result thereof, the complainant charges the said decree of divorce is a nullity and petitions this…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Amparo Mining Co. v. Fidelity Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1908
- Litowich v. LitowichSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
- Lister v. ListerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1915
- Indianapolis Piano Manufacturing Co. v. CavenIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Pinkinson v. PinkinsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Barney E. Sachs v. Margheritta C. SachsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- Sherman v. Federal Security AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- State v. NajjarNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Payne v. PayneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
- State v. De MeoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955