Legal Opinion

Litowich v. Litowich

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1878PublishedCited by 30 opinions

M'ror from Saline District Court. In an action against her husband, B. A. Litowich, and two others, as defendants, Mrs. Blanche Litowich, as plaintiff, obtained an order directing her said, husband to pay a certain sum for her support pending the action, and for the expenses of the suit, and an order restraining her husband and Ed. Wittman, one of said defendants, from conveying or disposing of certain property. These orders were granted 31st August 1877, at chambers.

Read the full summary

M'ror from Saline District Court. In an action against her husband, B. A. Litowich, and two others, as defendants, Mrs. Blanche Litowich, as plaintiff, obtained an order directing her said, husband to pay a certain sum for her support pending the action, and for the expenses of the suit, and an order restraining her husband and Ed. Wittman, one of said defendants, from conveying or disposing of certain property. These orders were granted 31st August 1877, at chambers. Defendants Litowich and Wittman appeal, and bring the case here on error.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

statement of tRe ease. This was an action brought by Blanche Litowich, against B. A. Litowich, Ed. Wittman, and Ray Hollingsworth, for the purpose of obtaining alimony from said Litowich, her alleged husband, and of restraining all the defendants from selling or disposing of the property of her said alleged husband. At the time of the commencement of this action the plaintiff obtained an order from the judge of the court below, at chambers, granting to her, as alimony pendente lite, (using the word alimony in a broad sense, including suit…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thompson v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Borden v. FitchNew York Supreme Court · 1818
  3. Starbuck v. MurrayNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  4. Shumway v. StillmanNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  5. Kerr v. . KerrNew York Court of Appeals · 1869

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Harding v. HardingIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. McCormick v. McCormickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  3. Worthington v. District Court of the Second Judicial DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Adams v. AdamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API