State v. Green
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NEHRING, Justice:
¶ 1 Defendant Thomas Arthur Green appeals his conviction for rape of a child. Mr. Green presents eleven arguments on appeal which, when distilled, mount two central attacks on his one conviction: (1) that the trial court erred when it did not dismiss the child rape charge against him because the applicable statute of limitations had run; and (2) that the trial court did not have jurisdiction to hear the case. We agree with the trial court’s rulings on both issues and affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 Twelve-year-old Linda Kunz “betrothed” herself to her stepfather,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. BrakeUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. DanielsUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- West Valley City v. Majestic Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. NielsenUtah Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. LeeUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- Neff v. NeffUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- Golden Meadows Properties, LC v. StrandCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
- West Jordan City v. GoodmanUtah Supreme Court · 2006
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.