Legal Opinion

State v. Green

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 2005No. 20020725PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEHRING, Justice:

¶ 1 Defendant Thomas Arthur Green appeals his conviction for rape of a child. Mr. Green presents eleven arguments on appeal which, when distilled, mount two central attacks on his one conviction: (1) that the trial court erred when it did not dismiss the child rape charge against him because the applicable statute of limitations had run; and (2) that the trial court did not have jurisdiction to hear the case. We agree with the trial court’s rulings on both issues and affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 Twelve-year-old Linda Kunz “betrothed” herself to her stepfather,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. BrakeUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. DanielsUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  5. West Valley City v. Majestic Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. NielsenUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. LeeUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Neff v. NeffUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Golden Meadows Properties, LC v. StrandCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
  5. West Jordan City v. GoodmanUtah Supreme Court · 2006

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API