Legal Opinion
Center for Individual Freedom v. Natalie H. Tennant
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 18, 2013No. 11-1952, 11-1993PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge FLOYD wrote the opinion, in which Judge MOTZ and Judge DUNCAN joined.
OPINION
FLOYD, Circuit Judge:
The First Amendment provides that “Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech.” U.S. Const, amend. I. In its now-famous Citizens United v. FEC decision, the Supreme Court recognized that the First Amendment “has its fullest and most urgent application to speech uttered during a campaign for political office.” 558 U.S. 310, 130 S.Ct. 876, 898, 175 L.Ed.2d 753 (2010) (quoting Eu v. S.F. Cnty. Democratic…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Laura McFeeley v. Jackson Street EntertainmentCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- Jimmy Yamada v. William SnipesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Independence Institute v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Wash. Post v. McManusDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- Chula Vista Citizens for Jobs & Fair Competition v. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.