Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Rinderknecht

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1997No. 96-1993PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

We reject respondent’s arguments that the panel incorrectly admitted the statement of a co-conspirator and that relator did not prove the violations by clear and convincing evidence. Furthermore, we accept the findings, conclusions, and recommended sanction of the board. Accordingly, we indefinitely suspend respondent from the practice of law in Ohio and tax costs to him.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. HaasOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In re Universal Building ProductsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2010
  4. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. HaasOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. RinderknechtOhio Supreme Court · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API