Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Rinderknecht
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
We reject respondent’s arguments that the panel incorrectly admitted the statement of a co-conspirator and that relator did not prove the violations by clear and convincing evidence. Furthermore, we accept the findings, conclusions, and recommended sanction of the board. Accordingly, we indefinitely suspend respondent from the practice of law in Ohio and tax costs to him.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
2Cited by7 opinions
- Disciplinary Counsel v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. HaasOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- In re Universal Building ProductsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. HaasOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. RinderknechtOhio Supreme Court · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.