Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Haas

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1998No. 1997-2640PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 302.] CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. HAAS. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Haas,

1998-Ohio-93.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—One-year suspension—Paying insurance company salesman for referring personal injury claimants. (No. 97-2640—Submitted May 26, 1998—Decided September 30, 1998.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 96-107. __________________ {¶ 1} In 1990, respondent, Herbert Jaime Haas of Cincinnati, Ohio, Attorney

Registration No. 0015411,

entered…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Warren County Bar Ass'n v. BunceOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Warren Cty. Bar Assn. v. BunceOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. HaasOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. RinderknechtOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. HaasOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Columbus Bar Assn. v. CableOhio Supreme Court · 2026
  3. Ohio State Bar Assn. v. KanterOhio Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API