Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Hartman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 21, 1999PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 10, 1997, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant was terminated from his employment as a customer service representative for a bank after he failed to follow specific procedures for processing transactions involving the exchange of large denominations of currency for smaller denominations. Specifically, the record indicates that this service is normally provided as a courtesy to known…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re the Claim of DerianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Claim of TitusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re the Claim of SheehanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of CuelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Claim of MesserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of GuerrerioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of BerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.