State v. Powell, 10-07-12 (3-10-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant, Brian Powell, appeals the judgment of the Mercer County Court of Common Pleas resentencing him to notify him of post-release control. On appeal, Appellant asserts that the trial court could not impose post-release control at a later date; that, when post-release control is not imposed during the original sentencing, a defendant is not subject to post-release control; that, if post-release control may be imposed at a later date, the trial court must conduct a new sentencing hearing; that the State waived the issue of post-release control by failing to appeal…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. PayneOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. BezakOhio Supreme Court · 2007
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. YeaplesOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. PerkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. James, Ca2008-04-037 (3-30-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. Hopkins, 17-08-01 (6-2-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. MarreroOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.