Legal Opinion

Zidell v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 24, 1976No. 18856PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUITTARD, Justice.

This suit concerns whether the proceeds of casualty insurance on an apartment complex should be paid to the mortgagors or to the mortgagee. We hold that even though the mortgagors have repaired the property at their own expense, the mortgagee is entitled to the proceeds under the deed of trust, which contains an assignment of the policy and its proceeds to the mortgagee as security for the debt.

The case was tried on a stipulation of facts from which the following statement is taken. Allan and Alvin Zidell were owners of an apartment complex subject to a deed of trust…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. J. H. Milliken & Co. v. Callahan CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. British-America Assurance Co. v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Huey Philp v. Ewell, AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  4. Schultz v. MortonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Taylor v. BonillaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. English v. FischerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. Eagle Life Insurance Co. v. G.I.C. Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1985
  4. Bonnie Sue Roberts in Her Capacity as Independent of the Estate of Charlotte Roberts v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2013
  5. Allen v. Alison Mortgage Investment TrustCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API