Little Butte Consolidated Mines Co. v. Girand
Arizona Supreme Court
WRIT OP ERROR from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, iu and for the County of Maricopa. Edward .Kent, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
This is an action brought by James B. Girand against the Little Butte Consolidated Mines Company, a corporation, J. E. Meyer and George W. Bishop. Omitting the formal parts, the material allegations of the complaint are as follows: “That on, to wit, the sixteenth day of March, 1909, the plaintiff entered into a contract in writing with the defendant corporation under the name and style of Arizona Bouse Copper Company, by virtue of which contract the said defendant corporation granted to plaintiff the right, privilege, and option to purchase from the defendant corporation certain valuable…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Howard v. . DalyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Crowley v. Genesee Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
- Olmstead v. BachCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
- Litchenstein v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
- Richardson v. Eagle Machine WorksIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sherbondy v. Tulsa Boiler & MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- American Credit Bureau, Inc. v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Granow v. AdlerArizona Supreme Court · 1922
- Rogers v. Crane Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Southern Pacific Co. v. PenderArizona Supreme Court · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.