Legal Opinion

Southern Pacific Co. v. Pender

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1913No. Civil No. 1304PublishedCited by 4 opinions

WRIT OF ERROR from the Superior Court of the County of Yuma. J. E. O’Connor, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtFranklin, C. J.

James Pender, as plaintiff in the court below, prosecuted this action against the Southern Pacific Company, a corporation, defendant, to recover damages for negligent injury to his property. The plaintiff was successful, and from a judgment in his favor and the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial the case is brought here on writ of error. The order denying the motion for a new trial was entered June 11, 1912.

This ease was formerly before this court on appeal, and on motion of James Pender, the appellee, the appellant confessing the right to a dismissal, the appeal was dismissed,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Klein v. Southern Pac. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1905
  2. Little Butte Consolidated Mines Co. v. GirandArizona Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Lombard v. WadeOregon Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bigler v. WelkerArizona Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Rae v. Brunswick Tire Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Wood's Pharmacy, Inc. v. KentonArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Lesueur v. BacksteinArizona Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API