Legal Opinion

Sherbondy v. Tulsa Boiler & MacHinery Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 20, 1924No. 11755PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JARMAN, C.

This action was commenced in the district court of Pawnee county by the Tulsa Boiler & Machinery Company, as plaintiff, against the Federal Refining Company, W. E. Sherbondy, the Acme Refining & Pipe Line Company, and A. W. Henn, defendants, for personal judgment against the Federal Refining Company, and to foreclose a materialman’s lien upon certain land on which the Federal Refining Company had built a refinery. The cause was submitted to the court without a jury; resulting in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant Federal Refining Company in' the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Joplin Sash & Door Works v. Oklahoma Presbyterian College for GirlsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Parker v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. J. Thomas & Co. v. MowersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  4. M. R. Smith Lumber Co. v. RussellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  5. Yockey v. YockeySupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Wallace v. BrumbackSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
  2. American-First Title & Trust Company v. EwingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  3. Amtech Lighting Services Co. v. Payless Cashways (In Re Payless Cashways, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  4. William M. Graham Oil & Gas Co. v. Oil Well Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Harlow Publishing Co. v. PatrickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API