Legal Opinion
Smoliak v. Myhr
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 22, 1985No. C2-84-1028PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE, Judge.
The appellants brought this action to compel specific performance of a real estate contract. The trial court determined that there had been no meeting of the minds concerning the amount of the property to be sold, and denied the appellants’ request. We affirm.
FACTS
In September 1980 appellant Gary Smol-iak and his wife purchased a parcel of land in Cook County, Minnesota adjacent to the property which is the subject of this lawsuit. At the time he purchased the land, Smoliak indicated to his real estate agent, respondent Marlene Dahlgren, that he would also be interested…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Minneapolis Cablesystems v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Doyle v. WohlrabeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- State v. HartmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Ortendahl v. BergmannCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Miracle Construction Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kolby v. Northwest Produce Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Zahler v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- In re the Minnesota Independent Equal Access Corporation's Application for a Certificate of Public Convenience & NecessityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Matter of Mn. Indep. Equal AccessCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991