Legal Opinion

Maxfield v. Cintas Corp. No. 2

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 22, 2009No. 08-2266PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYE, Circuit Judge.

Darold Maxfield appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his motion for a new trial after a jury found Cintas Corporation did not violate the Uniform Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA), 38 U.S.C. §§ 4301-4333, by taking adverse employment actions against Max-field because of his military service. We affirm.

I

This case is before us for the third time. Initially, Maxfield sued Cintas alleging both race discrimination claims and violations of USERRA arising out of Maxfield’s employment with Cintas. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Silvio Perez RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  2. Darold Maxfield v. Cintas Corporation No. 2Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  3. Kaytina Harrison v. Purdy Brothers Trucking Company, Inc. David CareyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  4. Darold Maxfield v. Cintas Corporation, No. 2Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lisdahl v. Mayo FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  2. Haigh v. Gelita USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  3. Mace v. WillisDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2017
  4. Lisdahl v. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education & ResearchDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
  5. Transamerica Life Insurance v. Lincoln National Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API