State v. Jones
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.
In this criminal matter, we decide whether ORS 41.910 requires suppression of (1) statements that defendant made during two police interviews before the police notified defendant that they had been videotaping each interview; and (2) police officer testimony that described those same statements. The trial court granted defendant’s pretrial motions to suppress both the prenotification parts of the videotape and the officers’ testimony describing defendant’s statements during those prenotification periods. The state appeals those rulings directly to this court pursuant to ORS 138.060(2)(a). For…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. SarichOregon Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. NeffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. NixCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. PrewCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.