Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. Giese

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 2006No. 20050158PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶ 1] Bryan L. Giese objects to a report by a hearing panel of the Disciplinary Board which found he violated N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 3.3, 5.5, and 8.1, and recommended he be suspended from the practice of law for 60 days and pay $1,772.05 in costs for the disciplinary proceeding. We conclude there is clear and convincing evidence Giese violated those rules, and we adopt the hearing panel’s recommendations.

I

[¶ 2] On June 3, 2003, this Court suspended Giese from the practice of law for 90 days, effective August 1, 2003, for violating N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.8, 3.1, 3.2, and 8.4(e), and N.D.R.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re the Reinstatement of PETERSONSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Application of ChristiansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against GieseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Farnham v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of North Dakota v. ChinquistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against ChinquistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. In the Matter of Application for Disciplinary Action Against StenslandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against GieseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API