Legal Opinion

Damico v. Dalton

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 6, 1983No. (2062)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

On January 25,1980, the plaintiff commenced an action against the defendant in the Superior Court for the judicial district of Fairfield at Bridgeport, claiming damage to his automobile arising out of a collision with an automobile owned and operated by the defendant. The defendant filed an answer and a counterclaim. In his counterclaim, the defendant sought to recover for damage to his automobile. After a trial to the court, the trial judge found the issues for the defendant on the complaint and on the counterclaim and rendered judgment for the defendant on the counterclaim for nominal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stults v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  2. Littlejohn v. ElionskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  3. Hammarlund v. TroianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  4. Zuboff v. SolomonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chapman Lumber, Inc. v. TagerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. Pollio v. Conservation CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  3. Bombero v. MarchionneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  4. Seismograph Service (England), Ltd. v. Bolt Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  5. Connecticut Car Rental v. Embassy Limo., No. Cv93 030 78 46 (Nov. 8, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API