State v. Archuleta
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
PARKER, C. J.
The appellants had been tried for murder and were acquitted. They were sworn and testified in their own behalf, and all told practically the same story. After the acquittal they were separately indicted for perjury in the murder case, and were convicted and sentenced, and have appealed from the judgment.
1. Upon the trial in this case the court reporter, who took the testimony in the murder case, was put upon the stand and testified as to the evidence given by the defendants on that trial. He read from a. transcript of his stenographic notes, by consent of all…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1912
- Ammons v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1902
- Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
- State v. HerreraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1922
- State v. AndersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated November 16, 1974District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- People v. SnyderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- State v. CasconeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- State v. StewartNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.