Legal Opinion

Gunter & Munson v. Meade & Bomar

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1890No. 3177PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Tarrant. Tried below before Hon. R. E. Beckham.

1Opinion of the Court

STAYTON, Chief Justice.

This suit was brought by appellees to remove cloud from and to quiet title to land in controversy, basing their right on a patent, as well as adverse possession for three years.

The land was patented to M. M. Purinton as assignee of Donato Leona on August 13, 1884, and the plaintiffs deraign title regularly from the patentee. It was located and surveyed as early as December 21, 1874, and the field notes returned to the General Land Office within the time prescribed bylaw, and was granted by virtue of what appeared to be a duplicate certificate issued by the Commissioner…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Adams v. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Winsor v. O'ConnorTexas Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Burnham v. Hardy Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Dunn v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Williams v. RandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  4. Halsey v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Hodges v. RossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API