Legal Opinion

Hodges v. Ross

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 14, 1894No. 213PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Kinney. Tried below before Hon. Winchester Kelso.

1Opinion of the Court

NEILL, Associate Justice.

On February 27, 1891, the plaintiff in error filed his petition in the District Court of Kinney County against Edward Ross, one of defendants in error, in trespass to try title for the recovery of a tract of 738 acres of land, known as survey number 118, patented to Thomas B. Huling.

The defendant in error plead not guilty, and three, five, and ten years statutes of limitations. He also impleaded his warrantors, Ann Ross and W. H. Maverick, who were made parties defendant and answered in the case. The case was tried before a jury, who returned a verdict for defendants,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Evitts v. RothTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Snow v. StarrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  3. Cantagrel v. Von LupinTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Parker v. NewberryTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Scranton v. TilleyTexas Supreme Court · 1856

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. EarnestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  2. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co. v. WarrickSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
  3. Bordages v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Surghenor v. AyersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Davis v. HoweCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API