Legal Opinion
Pocatello Education Ass'n v. Heideman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 5, 2007No. 06-35004PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff labor organizations (“Plaintiffs”) sued officials of the State of Idaho, claiming that the Voluntary Contributions Act (“VCA”), Idaho Code §§ 44-2004(2) and -2601 to -2605, violated Plaintiffs’ constitutional rights under the First Amendment as well as other constitutional provisions. Before the district court, the State officials conceded that all challenged provisions were unconstitutional, except Idaho Code § 44-2004(2), which prohibits any payroll deductions for “political activities.” The district court held the ban on payroll deductions to be…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ysursa v. Pocatello Education Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Planned Parenthood of Greater v. UshhsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Council of Insurance Agents & Brokers v. Molasky-ArmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- County of Santa Clara v. Astra USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Alaskan Independence Party v. AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.