Legal Opinion

Alaskan Independence Party v. Alaska

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 22, 2008No. 07-35186PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Circuit Judge:

Aaska requires political parties to nominate candidates for the state’s general election ballot in a state-run primary, in which any registered member of a political party may seek the party’s nomination. Nominees are then chosen by the vote of party-affiliated voters and any other voters whom the parties choose to let participate. The Aaskan Independence Party (“AIP”) and the Aaska Libertarian Party (“ALP”) contend that these laws burden their associational rights in violation of the First Amendment because they force them to associate with candidates who, they claim,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican PartySupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Eu v. San Francisco County Democratic Central CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Berger v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Western Radio Services Co. v. Qwest Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Utah Republican Party v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  4. Utah Republican Party v. HerbertDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2015
  5. Conant v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API