Council of Insurance Agents & Brokers v. Molasky-Arman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge:
On cross-motions for summary judgment, the district court declared Nevada’s “countersignature” statute, Nev.Rev.Stat. § 680A.300, unconstitutional, holding that it violates the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. 358 F.Suppüd 981, 982-83. The district court stayed its injunction pending appeal, and Defendant-Appellant Alice Molasky-Arman, Nevada Commissioner of Insurance (the Commissioner), now appeals. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm and remand.
I. Facts and proceedings…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Pacific Gulf Shipping Co. v. Vigorous Shipping & Trading SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Preminger v. PeakeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Center for Biological Diversity v. Marina Point Development Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Donohue v. Apple, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Sarasota Wine Market, LLC v. Eric SchmittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.