Legal Opinion
Schreiner v. City of Spokane
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 21, 1994No. 13577-2-IIIPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Sweeney, A.C.J.
John C. and Jane Schreiner, et al. (the Schreiners) appeal the summary judgment and order of public use and necessity entered for the City of Spokane (the City). They contend the Multi-Purpose Community Centers statute, RCW 35.59, and the Public Facilities Districts statute, RCW 36.100, do not authorize the condemnation of their property for construction of the new Spokane arena. We affirm.
I
Facts
In September 1989 the City and Spokane County (the County) adopted resolutions creating the Spokane Public Facilities District (PFD). RCW 36.100.010(2). Its purpose was to determine the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. ElginWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Hibbard v. Gordon, Thomas, Honeywell, Malanca & O'HernWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Van Dinter v. City of KennewickWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Harris v. Ski Park Farms, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Petition of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Beebe v. MosesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Spokane Airports v. RMA, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Wheeler v. State, Dept. of LicensingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Cascott, L.L.C. v. City of ArlingtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Beebe v. MosesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.