Legal Opinion

Natol v. Booth & Flinn Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 15, 1929No. 19630PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMason, C. J.

This is a proceeding to review a final order of the State Industrial Commission wherein the petitioner was denied compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

The respondent, Booth & Flinn Company, was constructing a gas pipe line and the petitioner, Ramon Natol, was employed in such work. The employees, about 150 in number, were furnished food and lodging in a camp which the company maintained near where such work was being done. The record does not disclose that the men were required, under their contract of employment, to stay in said camp, but it merely discloses that they were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holt Lumber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  2. John H. Kaiser Lumber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Southern Surety Co. v. GallowaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corporation v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Smith v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. McGeorge Corp. v. State Industrial Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. McGrewSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Mansfield v. Industrial Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API