Legal Opinion

Southern Surety Co. v. Galloway

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 13, 1923No. 12220PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.

This action was commenced in this court to review the decision of the State Industrial Commission Wherein respondent was allowed compensation for a broken leg. The agreed facts show that respondent was employed by the A. R. Young Construction Company, one of the petitioners, as a laborer, and on. the date of the injury was working on a grading plow. The A. R. Young Construction Company was engaged in constructing paving on G-. street. About 11 o’clock in the morning, the foreman of the company ordered respondent to drive his team, with grading plow attached, up on the. parking west of that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matter of Heitz v. . RuppertNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Hills v. BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Willis v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Matter of Daly v. . Bates RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Superior Smokeless Coal & Mining Co. v. HiseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Farmers Gin Co. v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Ryan v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Tinsman Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. SparksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  4. Sapulpa Refining Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Hill v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1933

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API