Legal Opinion

Maritan v. Birmingham Properties

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 17, 1989No. 87-1287PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

Gene Maritan appeals from an adverse summary judgment dismissing his action under the federal securities laws, and pendent state law claims, against Birmingham Properties, an Oklahoma limited partnership (“Birmingham”), Edwin Kronfeld, both individually and as surviving general partner of Birmingham (“Kronfeld”), and the First National Bank and Trust Company of Tulsa, Oklahoma, as successor personal representatives of the estate of F. Paul Thieman, deceased (we refer herein only to “Thieman"). Maritan apparently lost all or most of $482,591.80 in an…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  2. Foxfield Villa Associates v. RobbenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,216 Dallas Banghart and Michael G. Banghart v. Hollywood General Partnership Ed Wray Robert Rosen, M.D. And Barry Maron, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  4. Feigin v. Digital Interactive Associates, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. People v. RobbColorado Court of Appeals · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API