Legal Opinion

Feigin v. Digital Interactive Associates, Inc.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided February 4, 1999No. 95CA0387PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge ROY.

Plaintiff, Phillip A. Feigin, Colorado Securities Commissioner (the commissioner), appeals the trial court’s denial of his summary judgment motion asserting qualified immunity as to a counterclaim asserted by defendants, Digital Interactive Associates, Inc., Terry K. Vickery, Michael S. Beeler, Robert Kirk, Paul Montroy, Jay Katz, Jamie Tsutsui, Kenneth King, Paul Weidmaier, Anton Walker, Russ Howard, Barbara Beagen, Elizabeth Littleton, Charles (Chas) Gunther, and Douglas Ethan Mallach. We reverse.

Digital Interactive Associates, Inc., (Digital) is a venture capital firm…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. John D. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Gordon G. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. McCloud v. TestaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  5. Garramone v. RomoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. PahlColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Rush Creek Solutions, Inc. v. Ute Mountain Ute TribeColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. People v. HebertSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  4. People v. HooverColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. People v. RobbColorado Court of Appeals · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API