Legal Opinion
Pit River Tribe v. United States Forest Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 2, 2010No. 09-15385PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge:
This appeal arises out of an action by the Pit River Tribe, the Native Coalition For Medicine Lake Highlands Defense, and Mount Shasta Bioregional Ecology Center (collectively Pit River) against the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the United States Forest Service, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, and the Department of the Interior (collectively agencies), and against Calpine Corporation (Calpine). This case has already resulted in one appeal to this court, Pit River Tribe v. United States Forest Service, 469 F.3d 768, 772 (9th Cir.2006) (Pit…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Carson v. American Brands, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Good Samaritan Hospital v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Holly W. BAUMAN Et Al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Respondent, Union Oil Company, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Sierra Forest Legacy v. ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Hillsdale Environmental Loss Prevention, Inc. v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Pit River Tribe v. Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility v. HopperCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- United States v. LuongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.