Legal Opinion

State v. Townsend

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 2002No. 71070-8PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, C.J.

he principal issue we are called upon to resolve is whether a Spokane police officer violated a provision in Washington’s privacy act when he saved and printed e-mail and real time client-to-client ICQ messages between Donald Townsend and a fictitious child. We conclude that the act was not violated because Townsend impliedly consented to the recording of his e-mail and ICQ *670communications. We, therefore, uphold the decision of the Court of Appeals affirming Townsend’s conviction in superior court on a charge of attempted second degree rape.

I

The facts which we set forth hereafter are largely…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. WorkmanWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. MyrickWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Kadoranian v. Bellingham Police DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. State v. AthanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. AthanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. ChristensenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. HintonWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. LutherWashington Supreme Court · 2006

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API