State v. Townsend
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, C.J.
he principal issue we are called upon to resolve is whether a Spokane police officer violated a provision in Washington’s privacy act when he saved and printed e-mail and real time client-to-client ICQ messages between Donald Townsend and a fictitious child. We conclude that the act was not violated because Townsend impliedly consented to the recording of his e-mail and ICQ *670communications. We, therefore, uphold the decision of the Court of Appeals affirming Townsend’s conviction in superior court on a charge of attempted second degree rape.
I
The facts which we set forth hereafter are largely…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. WorkmanWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. MyrickWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Kadoranian v. Bellingham Police DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- State v. AthanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. AthanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. ChristensenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. HintonWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. LutherWashington Supreme Court · 2006
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.