State v. Luther

¶1

Madsen, J.

Defendant Ronald Luther raises constitutional challenges to his conviction for attempted possession of child pornography. He also claims that there is insufficient evidence to uphold his conviction. We conclude that the statutes prohibiting the attempted possession of depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct *66are not constitutionally overbroad, that Luther was not unlawfully convicted of possessing constitutionally protected materials, and that sufficient evidence supports his conviction. We affirm the Court of Appeals.

FACTS

|2 In February 2000, Seattle Police…