Crowley Ex Rel. Corning Inc. Investment Plan v. Corning, Inc.
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
SIRAGUSA, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This Employee Retirement Income Security Case (“ERISA”) ease is before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). 1 After considering the papers filed in support of, and in opposition to, the motion, and oral argument having been heard on December 4, 2002, the Court grants defendants’ motion and dismisses the ease.
LEGAL STANDARD FOR A MOTION TO DISMISS.In considering a motion for dismissal under Rule 12, a defendant must show that the plaintiff can prove no…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Rothman v. GregorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. SchoonejongenSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- In Re Bear Stearns Companies, Inc. Securities, Derivative, & Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- In Re Polaroid ERISA LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- In Re CMS Energy ERISA LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- In Re Morgan Stanley Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- In Re Sprint Corp. ERISA LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.