Legal Opinion

Levicoff v. Richard I. Rubin & Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1964No. Appeal, 211PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Musmanno,

Some time prior to May, 1960, Anne E. .McCabe, owner of a tract of land in Philadelphia, decided to erect on it a shopping center and call it the Ridge & Domino Lane Center. As is customary in these operations, which are having a tremendous impact on .the buying habits and domestic routine of nearly the whole nation’s buying population, Miss McCabe, through her agents, Richard I. Rubin & Co., Inc., sought to obtain lessees in anticipation of the center’s actual construction. To this end, the Rubin Co., as agents for the lessor, entered into a lease with Bernard…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Griffith v. ScheungrabCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Alois v. WaldmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  3. Elliott-Lewis Corp. v. York-Shipley, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. West v. Fidelity-Baltimore National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  5. Philadelphia Saving Fund Society v. SternSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Easton Theatres, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Land & Mortgage Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. House of Pasta, Inc. v. MayoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Delaware River Port Authority v. ThornburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Red Bell Brewing Co. v. GS Capital, L.P. (In Re RBGSC Investment Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. PendletonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API