Legal Opinion

In re T.S.W.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 4, 2012No. 104,424PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Moritz, J.:

Cherokee Nation, Intervenor, challenges the district court’s decision under the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), 25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq. (2001), to deviate from ICWA’s placement preferences, see 21 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (2001), based upon the bio*426logical non-Indian mother s preference that her child be placed with a non-Indian family. Because we conclude that absent a request for anonymity by a biological parent, a parent’s placement preference cannot override ICWA’s placement factors, we reverse the district court’s determination.

Factual and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  4. Kansas Medical Mutual Insurance v. SvatySupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  5. Shipe v. Public Wholesale Water Supply District No. 25Supreme Court of Kansas · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In re Adoption of T.M.M.H. – Per CuriamSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  2. Adoption B.B. v. R.K.B.Utah Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  4. State v. MarinelliSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  5. Kaelter v. SokolSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API