Legal Opinion

In re C.H.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 2000No. 99-146PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

¶ 1 The Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians of Oregon (the Tribe) and Scott and Tena Ehret (the Ehrets) appeal from the order of the Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County, continuing the foster care placement of C.H., a youth in need of care, with Janine and Doug Alberda (the Alberdas) and authorizing the Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services (DPHHS) to commence proceedings for the Alberdas to formally adopt C.H. We reverse and remand with instructions.

¶2 The dispositive issue is whether the District Court erred in concluding that good cause exists to deviate…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. In re M.E.M. Youth in Need of CareMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  3. In Re the Custody of S.E.G.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  4. In Re the Adoption of RiffleMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Matter of Baby Boy DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. PiggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  2. In re K.B.Montana Supreme Court · 2013
  3. C.L. v. P.C.S.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. In Re CHMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. In re J.S.Montana Supreme Court · 2014

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API