Legal Opinion

Haddock v. Quinn

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 9, 2009No. 2-06-472-CV, 2-07-048-CVPublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANNE GARDNER, Justice.

I. Introduction

In this consolidated interlocutory appeal and mandamus proceeding, Relator and Appellant Gerald W. Haddock seeks relief from the trial court’s order staying arbitration proceedings that he initiated against Appellees and Real Parties in Interest William F. Quinn, Paul E. Rowsey, III, John Goff, Terry N. Worrell, Crescent Real Estate Equities Company (“CEI”), Crescent Real Estate Equities Limited Partnership (“CREELP”), and Crescent Real Estate Equities, Limited (“CREE”).

Haddock raises three issues. In his first issue, Haddock argues that the trial…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Saxa Inc. v. Dfd Architecture Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
  2. Schlumberger Technology Corp. v. Baker Hughes Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  3. Dhara Gayle Hogg v. Lynch, Chappell & Alsup, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2015
  4. Adams v. STAXXRING, INC., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
  5. Tuscan Builders, LP v. 1437 SH6 L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2014

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API