Legal Opinion

Abbott v. Gould, Inc.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1989No. 87-857, 87-874PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

In these consolidated appeals the plaintiffs-appellants, a number of former employees and personal representatives of certain former employees of defendant-appellee, Gould, Inc., seek to recover damages allegedly caused by the employer’s conduct and that of its contract physician, defendant Robert J. Fitzgibbons, Sr., M.D. Gould demurred in part on the ground that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. That court sustained Gould’s demurrers and dismissed the actions as against it, which dismissal the plaintiffs assign as error. We affirm.

Pursuant to the district court’s novel…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. KozminskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Millison v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  4. Johns-Manville Products Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Holdsworth v. Greenwood Famers Co-opNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Estate of Teague v. Crossroads Co-op Assn.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Bradley v. HopkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Harsh International, Inc. v. Monfort Industries, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Melvin Smith and Mona Smith v. Gould, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API