Legal Opinion
Republic Property Trust v. Republic Properties Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 2008No. Civil Action 07-595 (RCL)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, District Judge.
Defendants Richard L. Kramer (“Kramer”) and Republic Properties Corporation (“RPC”) and separately, defendant Stephen A. Grigg (“Grigg”), have moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ amended complaint for failure to state a claim. The Court has considered plaintiffs’ amended complaint [10]; Kramer and RPC’s motion [14], plaintiffs’ opposition thereto [23], and Kramer and RPC’s reply [25]; Grigg’s motion [15], plaintiffs’ opposition thereto [22], and Grigg’s reply [26]; and the applicable law. For the reasons set forth below, both motions are hereby…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Liberty Property Trust v. Republic Properties Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Stevens v. InPhonic, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Liberty Property Trust v. Republic Properties Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Ord v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Liberty Property Trust v. Republic Properties Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.