State v. Serr
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] The State appeals an order dismissing charges of conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance against Karmon Koble and Michael Serr. We conclude we have jurisdiction to hear this appeal, and because probable cause does not exist to bind the defendants over for trial, we affirm.
I
[¶ 2] Karmon Koble and Michael Serr were each charged by criminal complaint with two counts of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver and one count of conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance. A preliminary hearing was held, and the trial court found probable cause to…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. BayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Carol Kozinski, Ilmi Fejzoski, James Havelka, Jeanette Martinez, James Brennan, James Abney, Mark Morgan, and Peter DemopoulosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. William Ivey, United States of America v. Mary Johnson, United States of America v. James NanceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. BluntNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. CainNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. GwytherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. FreedNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- City of Fargo v. WonderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.