Legal Opinion

People v. Huston

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 2011No. Docket 141312PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkman, J.

At issue in this case is whether the trial court properly assessed 15 points for offense variable (OV) 10. OV 10 should have 15 points assessed when the defendant has engaged in “predatory conduct” to “exploit[] . . . a vulnerable victim.” MCL 777.40(1)(a). Contrary to the Court of Appeals’ holding, in order to assess 15 points for OV 10, the defendant’s preoffense conduct only has to be directed at “a victim,” not any specific victim, and the victim does not have to be inherently vulnerable. Instead, a defendant’s “predatory conduct,” by that conduct alone (eo ipso), can create or enhance a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Robinson v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  3. People v. MorsonMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People v. CannonMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Wold Architects and Engineers v. StratMichigan Supreme Court · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. People v. Ackah-EssienMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. People v. LewisMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. People v. KosikMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Bloomfield Township v. KaneMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. People v. NeedhamMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API