Legal Opinion

People v. Cannon

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 2008No. Docket 131994PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

At issue in this case is whether the trial court properly assessed 15 points for predatory conduct under offense variable ten (OV 10) when it calculated defendant’s sentencing guidelines range.1 We conclude that both lower courts failed to apply the correct test in scoring OV 10. Therefore, we remand the case to the trial court to reconsider whether to assess 15 points for predatory conduct under OV 10 and to resentence defendant if it assesses no points.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Defendant entered a Burger King restaurant in the city of Saginaw. His codefendants, Maurice Mayes and Larry…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. People v. KimbleMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  3. People v. MorsonMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Apsey v. Memorial HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  5. People v. ApgarMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. People v. LockettMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. People v. HarversonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. People v. NixMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. People v. SteeleMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. People v. BowlingMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API