Crook v. Contreras
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHARA, J.
Appellant Louie G. Contreras (hereafter Contreras) has two appeals before this court regarding the same set of 1998 documents signed by the decedent. In one appeal (H021934), he claims that these documents are valid codicils to the decedent’s 1988 will exercising her power of appointment over assets in a 1988 trust. In the other appeal (H021933), he argues that these same documents are valid amendments to the 1988 trust permitting her to exercise her power of appointment by an instrument other than a will and exercising that power of appointment. His arguably inconsistent…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- County of Alameda v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Estate of MadisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Ephraim v. Metropolitan Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
- In Re Estate of SpitzerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Gardenhire v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Giammarrusco v. SimonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- In Re Cable Family Trust June 10, 1987New Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- Cable v. Wells Fargo Bank New Mexico, N.A.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- Laycock v. HammerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.