Legal Opinion

Laycock v. Hammer

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 6, 2006No. D046422PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BENKE, J.

The decedent in this case, Spearl Ellison, purchased a substantial life insurance policy 13 years before his death and assigned all of his interest in the policy, including the right to any benefits, to an irrevocable life insurance trust he had established. When Ellison died the life insurance company paid $767,263.70 in death benefits to the trustee of the trust, Ellison’s grandaughter, respondent Lynda Laycock.

Shortly before Ellison’s death, appellants Leonard H. Hammer, Jr., Hammer Realty Group, Inc., and KanTex Hospitality, Inc. (collectively Hammer), had obtained a $4.65…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Crouse v. Brobeck, Phleger & HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Distefano v. ForesterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Rubenstein v. RubensteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. In Re BarnesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. AguilarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Fiumara v. GalvinMassachusetts Superior Court · 2011
  3. In re: Patrick LazzariUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. In re: Robert FerranteUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Marriage of Stevens CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API