Legal Opinion

Kane v. Garcia Espitia

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 31, 2005No. 04-1538PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent Garcia Espitia, a criminal defendant who chose to proceed pro se, was convicted in California state court of carjacking and other offenses. He had received no law library access while in jail before trial — despite his repeated requests and court orders to the contrary — and only about four hours of access, during trial, just before closing arguments. (Of course, he had declined, as was his right, to be represented by a lawyer with unlimited access to legal materials.) The California courts rejected his argument that his restricted library access violated his Sixth Amendment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Albert Bribiesca v. George Galaza, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Johnny B. Milton v. P.J. Morris, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. United States of America Ex Rel. John E. George v. Michael LaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. Benjamin Charles SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. Carlos Mendoza v. Tom L. Carey, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Stenson v. LambertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. People v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Goncalves v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Rountree v. BalickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API