Legal Opinion
Rountree v. Balicki
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 13, 2011No. 09-1189PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.
This appeal by Marshall Rountree, from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition, requires us to decide if the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, was unreasonable in concluding that alleged violations of Rountree’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel did not undermine the reliability of the sentence he received for an armed robbery he committed in Camden County, New Jersey. Applying provisions of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Karim Eley v. Charles EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Collins v. Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Carl Blue v. Rick Thaler, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Christopher Taft Landers v. WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Garuti v. RodenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.