Legal Opinion

United States v. Benjamin Charles Smith

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 3, 1990No. 89-5547, 89-5548PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULL, Chief District Judge.

Arguing that his conviction should be reversed because the trial court violated his sixth and fourteenth amendment rights by denying him access to the legal material and facilities necessary for self-representation, the appellant in this case appeals the Judgment and Commitment Order entered after a jury verdict of guilty was returned against him on an escape charge. The issue in this case is whether a defendant who voluntarily waives his right to counsel, as well as standby counsel, is entitled to access to a law library pursuant to the sixth and fourteenth…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Younger v. GilmoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. United States v. Wilton ChatmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael Lee SammonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  2. Eugene Williams Gall, Jr. v. Phil Parker, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Willie Kincaide (96-1771), Christian R. Key (96-1915), Keith Elbert Riley (96-1772)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  4. State v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Bourdon v. LoughrenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API